data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04e6/f04e6fdecc3e822a4cdb01c4b0b8d6c08a4ff875" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0aa5/e0aa5fbe6b562da397840c3d8a9951453ea0fe83" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c32e1/c32e10454a85b53b0529c051c6f76d694ebc45c4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb00d/cb00d24012573a278a7d3f94a3b10a0009f794a4" alt=""
Novak Djokovic.
Expert at ball play, apparently.
Wimbledon Fortnight is underway...
The sperm of all 18-year-olds should be frozen for use in later life, a UK bioethicist has argued.Read the whole article on the BBC
Dr Kevin Smith, from Abertay University in Dundee, says sperm-banking on the NHS should "become the norm".
Pitcairn Island, the world’s smallest nation, has passed a law allowing same-sex marriage after it received unanimous support from the local council.Come on, Oz!
Pitcairn’s deputy governor Kevin Lynch said the change was suggested by British authorities after England, Wales and Scotland legalised gay marriage last year.
The island is a British Overseas Territory that was settled in 1790.
The amended law now states that “marriage means the union of two people regardless of their sex, sexual orientation or gender identity.”
But curiously, seventh-generation resident Meralda Warren said there were no gay couples wanting to marry.
“It’s not Pitcairn Islanders that were pushing for it,” she said. “But it’s like anything else in the world. It’s happening everywhere else, so why not?”
And “why not?” are the exact words being uttered by Australia’s same-sex marriage advocates left scratching their heads as to how the country is still sitting on its hands while momentum grows around the world.
A charity has pledged to investigate after including a typo on a new road sign honouring Dame Shirley Bassey."Wps" indeed.
Dame Shirley unveiled the sign on Saturday, marking the official renaming of the main road running past the Noah’s Ark Children’s Hospital for Wales.
The new name was given as a means of paying tribute to the diva’s work as a patron of the charity.
But the Welsh translation of Dame Shirley Bassey Way was given as “Ffordd Y Fonsig Shirley Bassey”.
The Welsh word for “dame” is “y fonesig”.
Dame Shirley did not seem to notice the typo, wiping away a tear as she declared: “It means everything to me.
“It’s my home town and to be honoured like this is on a par with when the Queen gave me that title.”
Average Londoners are excitedly looking forward to missing a host of cultural events in the capital.So true, it hurts.
With the weekend almost here, residents are consulting events listings to choose the concerts, exhibitions and plays that they will not be attending.
Stephen Malley of Kilburn said: “In London you really feel that the world is someone else’s oyster. Where else in the world could I miss Rihanna playing ten nights in a row?
“Whether it’s an A-list star on stage in the West End I can’t get tickets for, a Michelin-starred restaurant laughing contemptuously at my attempt to make a reservation or a nightclub with guest list admittance only, London has it all.”
But long-time residents admit that they have become blasé about the city’s attractions.
Risk assessor Emma Bradford said: “I feel like I’ve not done pretty much everything there is to not do in London.
“The highlight has to be missing the Olympics in 2012. That was a real once in a lifetime non-experience.
“Still, I could never live anywhere like Birmingham. All those grubby little theatrical experiences within my financial reach. Vile.”
I had rather naively thought that a central part of Conservative philosophy was that, unless there is strong evidence of harm that can be prevented or alleviated by Government action, it's usually best to let people live their lives without interference from the state.
Theresa May's Home Office thinks rather differently. It proudly announced last month that since 2010 it has banned more than 500 new drugs, as though this were an end and a self-evident good in itself.
Well, we now know it was not an end, it was a beginning... In its Psychoactive Substances Bill, the second reading of which is to take place in the House of Lords next week, it has made proposals to ban all “psychoactive substances” apart from a few defined exceptions... whatever the wisdom of the goal, the Government seems to have decided that banning 500 substances is not enough. It must ban almost everything that gives pleasure.
And what a ban. Of all the many idiotic, ill thought out and pointless laws ever passed, this would be the one of the silliest...it is the definition of “psychoactive” which, rightly, has attracted the most comment.
Quote: "a substance produces a psychoactive effect in a person if, by stimulating or depressing the person's central nervous system, it affects the person's mental functioning or emotional state."
Any substance which gives pleasure, of course, “affects a person's emotional state.” The starting point of the Bill is that giving pleasure is sufficient justification for prohibition...
...Amyl nitrite and its chemical relatives, for example. In the form of “poppers” they are widely used, especially by gay men, to enhance sexual pleasure. They are not controlled drugs at present, largely because nobody has ever made a convincing case that they are particularly dangerous. Now they are to be banned not because of the harm they do, but because one of their pleasant effects is to produce euphoria and dis-inhibition – they “affect your emotional state” – so they are caught by Section 3 [of the Bill]...Horrendous.
Did you know that tea was a “psychoactive substance”? Well under this new law it will be, and you will be allowed to drink it only as a special exemption from the normal rule... It has even been suggested by the one of the country's best known legal bloggers, David Allen Green, that the delight produced by the scent of flowers could be enough to engage the provisions of the Bill, and what's more he is right. What stronger emotional response is there than that produced by the beautiful scent of roses delivered to the woman you love? Sorry, that very emotional response is enough to engage Section 3, and if you happen to hand them to her outside a school, or worse still arrange for someone under the age of 18 to deliver them, the Court is obliged by Section 6 to treat those facts as “aggravating features” for the purpose of sentencing. And don't think you could avoid the law by giving her perfume instead of flowers: the esters and oils in perfume are designed to seduce, which is of course an emotional response...
...the Home Office thinking is revealing. Instead of banning things because there is evidence that they will do harm Theresa May now wants to ban things because they cause pleasure.
The Bill is a textbook example of bad legislation, It is unnecessary, incomprehensible, largely unenforceable, and, by encouraging professional criminals into a new area of business it is likely to prove entirely counter-productive.